Aurora  Bautista Quicho
207 Albatross Lane
Fountain Valley, California

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Aurora Bautista Quicho,           )  CASE NO.  BC324176
              Counterclaimant,    )
                                  )  MOTION FOR CONTEMPT;
             v.                   )  NOTICE OF MOTION;
                                  )  AFFIDAVIT OF 
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF        )  Aurora Bautista Quicho
CALIFORNIA, Federal Credit Union, )  IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
Land Rover South Bay,             )  CONTEMPT; 
Mercedez Benz South Bay,          )  POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Quaker City Bank, Mark S. Arnold, )  
Amy-Hannah Broersma,              )  
Eileen C. Butko, Complainer Doe,  )  
FCU Doe, Land Doe, Mercedez Doe,  )  DATE:  
Quaker Doe, Laura C. Ellison,     )  TIME:  8:30 a.m.
Gregg Hayata, Omar Hazel,         )  DEPT:  30
David Hizami, Lisa V. Houle,      )
1168 Johnson, Jodi Michelle Link, )
Grady Miles, Paulette Paccione,   )
C. Rose, Sanjay Sahgal,           )
John Torrelli, Thomas R. Sokolov, )
John Shepard Wiley Jr. and        )
Cynthia Zuzga,                    )
                                  )
              Counterdefendants.  )
----------------------------------)----------------------------
NOTICE
TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 4, 2005 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, in Dept. "30" of the above-entitled Court, located at 111 North Hill St., Los Angeles, California, plaintiff Aurora Bautista Quicho will move this court for an order of contempt.

AFFIDAVIT, MOTION, AND POINTS AND AUTHORITES

1.  I am Aurora Bautista Quicho.  I have personal knowledge of the following facts and am competent to testify as to the truth of these facts if called as a witness.

2.  This affidavit is presented to the court (and not to a judge) as described in California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1211(a), paragraph 2.

3.  COMES NOW Aurora Bautista Quicho as one of the people of California to move the above-entitled court of record to find the inferior court known as The Superior Court of the State of California (hereinafter “Inferior Court”), Case Number YA58902, Torrance, California proceeding according to statute and not common law; and

Mark S. Arnold, purported judge; 
Laura C. Ellison, purported judge; 
Eric C. Taylor, purported judge; 
Steven Ralph Belis, purported deputy district attorney;
Christopher Glenn Fong, purported deputy district attorney;
Paul Francis Guthrie III, purported deputy district atty;
Greta Backstrom Walker, purported deputy district attorney;
Cynthia Denise Legardye, purported bar panel attorney;
Robin Dwayne Perry, purported bar panel attorney
Gary Yoshio Tanaka, purported alternate public defender;
Grady Miles, purported witness;
Monte Alcanter, purported deputy sheriff 

(hereinafter “Contemnors”) all subjects of this court; to be in civil contempt, criminal contempt, and/or misdemeanor contempt of this court.

4.  This motion is made on the grounds that said subjects of this court willfully conspired to, and did contemptuously subvert this court’s order to the inferior court to dismiss with prejudice the case called The People of the State of California vs. Aurora Bautista Quicho, Superior Court of California, Torrance, California, Case Number YA58902.  

5.  Further, on this above-entitled court of record made a final judgment finding that the inferior court entitled The People of the State of California vs. Aurora Bautista Quicho, Case Number YA58902 does not have jurisdiction over Aurora Bautista Quicho.  Subsequently, as noted above, this court ordered that the inferior court dismiss all charges nunc pro tunc.

6.  Further grounds are that said subjects of this court willfully conspired to, and did contemptuously subvert this court’s order to restore nunc pro tunc the liberties of Aurora Bautista Quicho.  The consequence of said contemptuous behavior is to interfere with the conduct of the business of the court, and subsequently the rights of the parties to orderly due process and liberty, and the authority and dignity of this court.

7.  This motion is further based on the pleadings, records and files of this court, and the affidavits and/or declarations of “Joseph E. Waldemar: Berg” (Exhibit “J”), Ron Boggs (Exhibit “K”), Barbara Busch (Exhibit “L”), Art Lawrence (Exhibit “M”), Richard Weigal (Exhibit “N”), and Aurora Bautista Quicho; and the Inferior Court’s Case Summary, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit “H”.

8.  Aurora Bautista Quicho further moves this court of record to issue such orders as may be necessary to enforce the rights of the parties, the authority and dignity of this court, and her full liberty unencumbered by said contemnors and the remaining defendants of the above-entitled court of record.

9.  During all proceedings in the Inferior Court, at all times Aurora Bautista Quicho maintained her position:  She always objected to every exercise of false jurisdiction that was asserted under color of law.  She never agreed to be represented by any defender public or private, and she always objected to such forced representation.  All entries in the Inferior Court’s Case Summary which lead one to believe that she voluntarily participated in the proceedings are false, with the exception of those which note her objections.

10.  Each of the following persons,

Mark S. Arnold, purported judge; 
Laura C. Ellison, purported judge; 
Eric C. Taylor, purported judge; 
Steven Ralph Belis, purported deputy district attorney;
Christopher Glenn Fong, purported deputy district attorney;
Paul Francis Guthrie III, purported deputy district atty;
Greta Backstrom Walker, purported deputy district attorney;
Cynthia Denise Legardye, purported bar panel attorney;
Robin Dwayne Perry, purported bar panel attorney
Gary Yoshio Tanaka, purported alternate public defender;
Grady Miles, purported witness;

has been served with a copy of this court’s final judgment, or is an officer or witness of the Inferior Court with full access to the Inferior Court’s public files, and knows or should have known of this court’s Order to Discharge which was served upon the Inferior Court.  Further, the judgment (containing an order to show cause) of this court of record has not been appealed, and no motion for reconsideration of judgment has been submitted; time has run and neither such appeal nor motion may be made.

11.  Further, Mark S. Arnold, purported judge; Laura C. Ellison, purported judge; and Grady Miles, purported witness; are each named defendants in this court (through their demurrers or defaults have admitted their lack of jurisdiction) and have a vested interest in the outcome of the Inferior Court’s decisions and the continued incarceration of Aurora Bautista Quicho, and when they act in the Inferior Court they cause her to lose her court and inhibit the effectiveness of this court of record.

12.  For the purpose of this motion only, the court of record is invited to use its incidental equitable powers to adopt the rule system native to the State of California. The contemnors have shown their preference for the State of California rule system over the common law rule system declared to be in effect by this court and the State of California.   If they must suffer the pains of breaking the rules, let them be subject to the rules of their own free will choosing. This courts attention is invited to the following portions of the California Code of Civil Procedure:

Sec. 1209. (a) The following acts or omissions in respect to a court of justice, or proceedings therein, are contempts of the authority of the court:

3. Misbehavior in office, or other willful neglect or violation of duty by an attorney, counsel, clerk, sheriff, coroner, or other person, appointed or elected to perform a judicial or ministerial service;

4. Abuse of the process or proceedings of the court, or falsely pretending to act under authority of an order or process of the court;

5. Disobedience of any lawful judgment, order, or process of the court;

6. Rescuing any person or property in the custody of an officer by virtue of an order or process of such court;

7. Unlawfully detaining a witness, or party to an action while going to, remaining at, or returning from the court where the action is on the calendar for trial;
Sec. 1897. The organic law is the Constitution of Government, and is altogether written. Other written laws are denominated statutes. The written law of this State is therefore contained in its Constitution and statutes, and in the Constitution and statutes of the United States.

13.  At all times herein mentioned, Contemnors had the ability to comply with the court’s order and continue to have the ability to do so. 

14.  At all times herein mentioned, the court’s Order to Discharge has remained in full force and effect.

15.  Aurora Bautista Quicho alleges that Contemnors alleged contempt is willful and with intent to frustrate the processes of this court of record and to deprive plaintiff of the benefits to which she is entitled under the order.  On information and belief Aurora Bautista Quicho alleges that one or more contemnors or persons acting in concert with them have contacted her family to enlist them to withdraw moral support from her, and to aid them in discouraging her from asserting her rights.

16.  WHEREFORE, I, the affiant herein, pray that this court either issue an order requiring Contemnors, to show cause, if any they have, why the court should not find each individually in contempt of court by reason of their violation of the Order to Discharge, as alleged above; or find Contemnors each individually in contempt of court by reason of their violation of the Order to Discharge, as alleged above; whichever the court deems proper. Further, I invite the court to use its discretion to determine whether or not this court of record should send, in accordance with Commission Rule 109(a), a written notification of its finding to the California Commission on Judicial Performance.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this affidavit was executed in the county of Los Angeles, California on June ___, 2005.

	Aurora Bautista Quicho