Superior Court of Washington for Pierce County

 Linda Lee, Stephenson,   Petitioner,  vs.,  Patrick H. Oishi, deputy prosecuting attorney for Pierce County for STATE OF WASHINGTON Respondent,	 Case No. ______________________________  Respondent's Answers to Writ of Habeas Corpus to disclose the legality, authority and the nature and cause of the Respondent's restraint of the Petitioner in the Respondent's action filed in DISTRICT COURT No. 1 OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE, TACOMA under cause no. 970197490	

State of Washington  County of __________	}	 ss.,	

Respondent's Answers to Writ of Habeas Corpus to disclose the legality, authority and the nature and cause of the Respondent's restraint of the Petitioner in the Respondent's action filed in DISTRICT COURT No. 1 OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE, TACOMA under cause no. 970197490

I, Patrick H. Oishi, on behalf of STATE OF WASHINGTON, under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States of America, summit that the following answers to the questions attached to the Writ of Habeas Corpus issued by Superior Court of Washington for Pierce County, are true correct and complete and not misleading.
PARTIES IN INTEREST

.What is the true and correct spelling of the Petitioner's appellation? (in upper and lower case).

a: * YES; The true and correct spelling of the Petitioner's Appellation is Linda Lee, Stephenson.

b:  NO; The true and correct spelling of the Petitioner's Appellation is not Linda Lee, Stephenson.

.Was there an affidavit of truth or other instrument filed within the action in which Petitioner spelled the Petitioner's appellation?

a:  * YES
b:   NO

.What is the true and correct spelling of the Defendants appellation on the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT? (Appellation in all upper case).

a: * YES; The true and correct spelling of the Defendant's appellation on the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is STEPHENSON, LINDA LEE

b:  NO; The true and correct spelling of the Defendant's appellation on the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is not STEPHENSON, LINDA LEE

.Was the Respondent aware of the true and correct spelling of the Petitioner's appellation when the original CRIMINAL COMPLAINT of the Respondent was filed in DISTRICT COURT No. 1 OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE, TACOMA?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #4 is yes. Is it not the duty and obligation of the Respondent to prevent or correct such error that would prejudice the rights of the Petitioner by disclosing the fact that the Petitioner was not properly named as a party in Respondents CRIMINAL COMPLAINT to the Petitioner as well as the court?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #4 is yes.  Did the Respondent ever notice the Petitioner, or the court that the Petitioner was not properly named as a party in the Respondents original Complaint?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.Was the spelling of Defendant's appellation ever rebutted by Respondent?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.Is an un rebutted affidavit admissible as evidence in a court of law?

a: * YES
b:  NO

9.Did the Respondent name the Petitioner in the Respondents CRIMINAL COMPLAINT as required by F.R.C.P. 10(a)?

a:  YES
b: * NO

10.Did the Respondent serve the Petitioner by process as required by F.R.C.P. 4 and 5?

a:  YES
b: * NO

11.Did the Respondent lawfully join the Petitioner to the Respondent's action under cause number 970197490 as required be F.R.C.P. 19?

a:  YES
b: * NO

12.Did the Respondent lawfully join the Petitioner as a voluntary substitute for the named Defendant as required be F.R.C.P. 17(a) before moving forward with the Respondent's action under cause number 970197490?

a:  YES
b: * NO

13.If the answer to questions #9, 10, 11, and 12 is yes, Petitioner demands that the Respondent produce a true certified copy of said documents baring the bona-fide signature of the Petitioner.

a:  Documents demanded are attached under exhibit _____
b: * No documents exist baring the bona-fide signature of the Petitioner, or the Petitioner's agent.
c:  Documents demanded are protected under the privacy act (cite________________________________ )

14.If the answer to questions #9, 10, 11 and 12 is no, by what authority does the Respondent aver that the Respondent has any authority or jurisdiction to join the Petitioner to the Respondents action under cause number 970197490 involuntarily?

a: * The Respondent has no authority of law to involuntarily join the Petitioner to the Respondent's action under cause no. 970197490.
b:  The Respondent is authorized under (Cite _____________________________ ) to involuntarily join the Petitioner to the Respondent's action under cause no. 970197490

.Do the terms State Resident and State Citizen mean artificial entity established under the legislative authority of the state?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #15 is yes, do the safeguards of the Bill of Rights as amended to the Constitution of the United States of America extend to a State Resident and/or State Citizen?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.Is the Petitioner a State Resident and State Citizen?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.If the answer to question #17 is yes, what fact and statute define "person" as used in this proceeding are relied upon to make a positive affirmation thereto?

a:  Facts and Statute which define "person" as used in this proceeding which the Respondent relies upon to make a positive affirmation that the Petitioner is a state Resident and State Citizen is attached hereto under exhibit _______.

b: * There are no facts or statute which define "person" as used in this proceeding for the Respondent to rely upon to make a positive affirmation that the Petitioner is a state Resident and State Citizen.

.Is the Petitioner a statutory person?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.If the answer to question #19 is yes, what fact and statute define "person" as used in this proceeding are relied upon to make a positive affirmation thereto?

a:  Facts and Statute which define "person" as used in this proceeding which the Respondent relies upon to make a positive affirmation that the Petitioner is a statutory person is attached hereto under exhibit _______.

b: * There are no facts or statute which define "person" as used in this proceeding for the Respondent to rely upon to make a positive affirmation that the Petitioner is a statutory person.

.Is the Petitioner a citizen of the United States of America?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Does the Tribunal and the Respondent recognize that Petitioner has unalienable rights to which the Petitioner is entitled in the process and procedures set forth in the matter of the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #22 is yes, does this tribunal recognize its duty and obligation to be bound by the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America as Supreme Law and render any provision of the Constitution or Law of the Republic of Washington a nullity if it conflicts with the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and prevent the enforcement of any law of the Republic of Washington or law of the premise of the legislative/venue jurisdiction of the STATE OF WASHINGTON that would abridge the inherent rights of the Petitioner?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Did Petitioner ever answer the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.Is the Petitioner entitled by law to effective assistance of counsel?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Does the Petitioner herein have a right to unfettered counsel of choice (without said counsel being a bar approved attorney) to act in their stead for them in the proceedings before the tribunal?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question # 26 is no. On what Constitutional or legislative authority is this limitation to choice of counsel based?

a:  The Legislative authority that limits the Petitioner's Choice of Counsel to is (Cite _____________________________ ).

b: * The is no Constitutional or Legislative authority which lawfully limits the Petitioner's choice of assistance of counsel.

.Is the Petitioner's choice of assistance of counsel limited to a member of the Washington State Bar?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.Is the Bar association of Washington also referred to as The State Bar?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #29 is yes. Is the State Bar an agency of the STATE OF WASHINGTON?.

a: * YES
b:  NO

.If the answer to question #30 is yes.  Are all members of the State Bar required to swear or affirm in writing to uphold the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and the Republic of Washington?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Are members of the State Bar required under obligation of oath to prevent or correct any act or omission that would abridge the rights of the Petitioner? If the answer is yes, are members of the State Bar who knowingly fail or neglect to render a nullity, any Washington state constitution provision or law that conflicts with the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America or prevent the enforcement of any Washington State law that would abridge the inherent rights privileges or immunities of the Petitioner, subject said member under the law, to damages suffered by the Petitioner, due to said members failure or neglect?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Are all members of the state bar agents of the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Is the state bar currently providing assistance of counsel to the Plaintiff through a member of the state bar?

a: * YES
b:  NO

35.Is it a conflict of interest for an agent of the state bar of the STATE OF WASHINGTON to also represent the interest of the Defendant in an action where the STATE OF WASHINGTON is the appoising  party?

a: * YES
b:  NO

36.If the Answer to question #35 is yes. Can the STATE OF WASHINGTON, compel a member of the state bar to involuntarily provide assistance of counsel to the Defendant while being an agent for the STATE OF WASHINGTON and thus violate their oath of office and code of ethics?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.If the answer to question #36 is yes, can the  STATE OF WASHINGTON fulfill it's obligation to insure effective counsel in a civil procedure requiring that the state agency known as the state bar provide assistance of counsel to both the Plaintiff and named Defendant?

a:  YES
b: * NO

38.Is the American Bar Association and the Washington Bar Association organized under the authority of the Crown of England?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Is the American Bar Association and the Washington Bar Association operating as agents of the Bank of England or any other bank financial institution, or commercial process to collect a private debt for the creditors of the UNITED STATES in bankruptcy under international law?

a: * YES
b:  NO

.Is the Petitioner a real party in interest in the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  YES
b: * NO

.If the answer to question #40 is no, is the Petitioner entitled to be discharged from the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * YES
b:  NO
VENUE

1.What is the venue of the tribunal in which the action is filed? 
B:Is the tribunal in the premises of the people's jurisdictional/venue of the Republic of Washington or 
C:the premises of the legislative venue of the STATE OF WASHINGTON or
D:in the premises of the people's jurisdictional/venue of the union of several states known as The United States of America or 
E:in the premises of the legislative venue of the UNITED STATES or
F:in the premises of the military of the United States, or
G:Other?

a:  
b: 
c: 
d: 
e: *
f:  other ___________________________________.

.Does the session laws of Republic of Washington require the Official Flag of the United States of America and the Official Flag of Washington be prominently displayed in the court room?

a: * YES
b:  NO

9.Are the proceedings under the venue and jurisdiction of a principal or authority foreign to the united States of America?

a: * YES
b:  NO

10.If the Answer to question #3 is no, why is the official flag of the United States of America not displayed in the court room?

a:  Reason why the official Flag of the United States in not displayed in the court room is attached under exhibit # _____________.

b: * There is no lawful reason why the official flag of the United States is not Displayed in the court room as required by law.

11.Is the tribunal organized under the general laws of 
a: the premises of the people of the Republic of Washington or 
b: the laws of the premises of the legislative jurisdiction/venue of the STATE OF WASHINGTON or 
c: under the authority and premises of an authority foreign to the premises of either the people of the Republic of Washington or 
d: of the legislative jurisdiction/venue of the UNITED STATES?

a: 
b: 
c: *
d: 

12.Does the tribunal have the power and authority to hear actions filed by the people in the premises of the people of the Republic of Washington venue/jurisdiction (without the legislative venue)?

a:  YES
b: * NO

13.Is the state agency known as the state bar an a: executive department agency or b: judicial department agency?

a: *
b: 

14.Are all judicial officers members of the state bar?

a: * YES
b:  NO

15.If the answer to question #7 is that the state bar is an executive department agency, is the DISTRICT COURT No. 1 OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE, TACOMA an executive/administrative department tribunal?

a: * YES
b:  NO

16.If the answer to question #9 is yes, does an executive tribunal have any bona-fide venue over judicial matters in the Republic of Washington?

a:  YES
b: * NO

17.Does the tribunal have lawful venue jurisdiction over the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  YES
b: * NO

18.If the answer to question # 11 is no, is the Petitioner entitled to be discharged from the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT for lack of venue jurisdiction?

a: * YES
b:  NO
JURISDICTION

1.What is the jurisdiction of the proceedings in the action? Is the proceedings in a: law, in b: equity, in c: admiralty, in d: maritime, in d: ecclesiastical, e: military, or f: other?

a: 
b: 
c: 
d: 
e: *
f: 

2.If the answer to question #1 is "other", please specify the jurisdiction of this tribunal in this proceeding.

a: * The answer to question #1 is not other.
b:  The answer to question #1 is other. The jurisdiction is _________________.

3.Does the tribunal and Respondent have authority to compel the Petitioner into proceedings by way of the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and to prejudice the rights of Petitioner, if Petitioner does not respond to the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT without first being entitled to know the nature and cause of the proceedings?

a:  YES
b: * NO

4.Was Petitioner asked to enter a plea or answer in regards to the prejudice or Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * YES
b:  NO

5.What is the name of the party who signed the charging instrument, CRIMINAL COMPLAINT or other, in which said instrument avers that the Petitioner has a signature on any instrument which makes the Petitioner liable to the Respondent for any specific performance set forth in the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * The name of the party who signed the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is ______________________________________________________________.
b:  The name of the party who signed the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is unknown

6.Is the party named in response to question #5 an attorney or other public official who has taken and signed and filed a written an oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of America as amended in 1791 (without the legislative venue of the United States), the Constitution for Washington and its Bill of Rights (without the legislative jurisdiction), and the Organic laws of the Republic of Washington?

a: * YES
b:  NO
c:  UNKNOWN

7.Is the party named in question #5 acting under their own authority or appointed under the authority of another?

a: * YES
b:  NO
c:  UNKNOWN

8.If the answer to question #7 is that the party named in question #5 is acting under the authority of another, what is the name of that party?

a: * The name of the party under who's authority the party named in question #5 is acting under is ________________________________________.
b:  UNKNOWN

9.Is the party named in response to question #8 one who is an attorney or other public official who has taken and signed and filed a written oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of America as amended in 1791 (without the legislative venue of the United States), the Constitution for Washington and its Bill of Rights (without the legislative jurisdiction), and the Organic laws of the Republic of Washington and who is also required to post a surety bond for the faithful performance of said duties under the oath described herein.

a: * YES
b:  NO

10.Where is the oath filed that is described in Question #9, and who is the person in charge of keeping said oath on file, and what is the title of that person?

a:  Oath is filed with ___________________________________ title ___________.
b: * Oath is not Filed

11.Who or what company, person, or entity is the issuer of the bond described in the answer to Question #9, and what is the address of said bond issuer?

a:  The bond was issued by _______________________________________ located at _______________________________________________________________.
b: * There is no bond

12.Does failure or neglect to file the written, signed oath of office or bond by the person responding to question #7 or any other public official result in that public official vacating the office?

a: * YES
b:  NO

13.Does controlling an office of trust by one who has not filed a written oath of office and/or bond constitute impersonation of a public official?

a: * YES
b:  NO

14.Is impersonation of a public official a: civil or b: criminal offense under the laws of the republic of Washington?

a: *
b: *

15.If the answer to question #7 is no.  By what authority does the party named in question #5 aver that said party is the lawful agent of the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a: * The party named in question #5 is not a lawful agent of STATE OF WASHINGTON.
b:  The party named in question #5 is a lawful agent of STATE OF WASHINGTON based on _____________________________________________________.
c:  The answer to question #7 is yes

16.If the answer to question #7 is no. Is the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT that of the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a:  YES
b: * NO
c:  The answer to question #7 is yes.

17.If the answer to Question #7 is no.  Has any action been initiated by the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a:  YES
b: * NO
c:  The answer to question  #7 is yes.

18.Has the party named in question #5 and/or #7 sworn or affirmed an oath to any other principal or authority foreign to the venue of the United States of America, which negates or nullifies the duty and obligation the oath or affirmation to uphold the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America imposes and bestows a title of nobility or  honor upon said party?

a: * YES
b:  NO

19.If the answer to question # 18 is yes.  To what foreign principal or authority has the party named in question #5 and/or #7 sworn said allegiance to?.

a: * The parties named in question #5 and #7 have sworn allegiance to ____________________ and authority and/or power foreign to the United States of America 

b:  The answer to question #18 is NO.

20.If the answer to question #18 is yes. Has the party named in question #5 and/or #7 filed with the department of immigration and naturalization as a foreign agent?

a:  YES
b: * NO
c:  The answer to Question #18 is NO.

21.Is the presiding judicial officer a duly elected judicial officer under a: the authority of the Constitution of the Organic Republic of Washington or b: the legislative authority of the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a: 
b: *

22.Is the presiding judicial officer in response to question #21 one who is an attorney or other public official who has taken and signed and filed a written oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of America as amended in 1791 (without the legislative venue of the United States), the Constitution for Washington and its Bill of Rights (without the legislative jurisdiction), and the Organic laws of the Republic of Washington and who is also required to post a surety bond for the faithful performance of said duties under said oath?

a: * YES
b:  NO

23.Where is the oath filed that is described in Question #22 and who is the person in charge of keeping said oath on file, and what is the title of that person?

a:  Oath is filed with ___________________________________ title ___________.
b: * Oath is not Filed

24.Who or what company, person, or entity is the issuer of the bond described in the answer to Question #22, and what is the address of said bond issuer?

a:  The bond was issued by _______________________________________ located at _______________________________________________________________.
b: * There is no bond

25.Does failure or neglect to file the written, signed oath of office or bond by the person in response  to question #22 or any other public official result in that public official vacating the office?

a:  *YES
b:  NO

26.Does controlling an office of trust by one who has not filed a written oath of office and/or bond constitute impersonation of a public official?

a: * YES
b:  NO

27.Is impersonation of a public official an a: civil or b: criminal offense under the laws of the republic of Washington?

a: *
b: *

28.Is the presiding judicial officer serving as a pro tempore judicial officer in regard the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * YES
b:  NO

29.If the answer to question #28 is yes, did said judicial officer secure a written agreement form all parties to the Respondent's motion, and file a written signed oath to the record of the court regarding the Respondent's motion as required by Washington Session Law 1987 c 73 §1; codified in RCW 2.08.180?

a:  YES
b: * NO
c:  The answer to question #28 is NO.

30.If the answer to question #29 is no, then by what authority does the pro tempore presiding judicial officer assume to preside over the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a: * The presiding Pro Tempore Judicial Officer has no lawful authority to presiding over the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.

b:  The Presiding Pro Tempore Judicial Officer's Authority to preside over the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is based on 
________________________________________________________________________.

c:  The answer to question #28 is NO.

31.Under what authority of law is the Petitioner obliged to comply with orders or directions of a party holding and controlling an office of trust under color of office who has no authorization of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON to act under the authority of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON?

a:  The authority of law which obligates the Petitioner to comply with orders or directions of a party holding and controlling an office of trust under color of office who has no authority of the of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON to act under the authority of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON is ___________________________________________.

b: * There is no authority of law requiring the Petitioner to comply with orders or directions of a party holding and controlling an office of trust under color of office who has no authority of the of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON to act under the authority of the Republic of Washington or the STATE OF WASHINGTON.

32.Is this case being prosecuted by a bona-fide public prosecutor under the general powers of an organic civil government, unfettered by legal disabilities including but not limited to bankruptcy or military oversight or control or other limitation, or by a common informer or other such private prosecutor?

a:  YES
b: * NO

33.If the Answer to question #32 is no.  What legal disability is this case being prosecuted under?

a: * The Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is being prosecuted under the legal disability of __________________________________.

b:  The answer to question #32 is YES.

34.Has the UNITED STATES been declared bankrupt?

a: * YES
b:  NO

35.If the answer to question #34 is yes.  By what authority does the Respondent bring action against the Petitioner while the WASHINGTON is in a state of bankruptcy?

a:  The authority of the Respondent to action against the Petitioner while the WASHINGTON is in a state of bankruptcy is ______________________________.

b: * There is no authority for the Respondent to action against the Petitioner while the WASHINGTON is in a state of bankruptcy.

c:  The answer to question #34 is NO.

36.What is the substance of the current money of account in the premises of the venue and jurisdiction of the tribunal and the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  Gold or Silver
b: * Bills of Credit
c:  Unknown

37.Does the substance of the money of account in the answer to Question #36 comply with the requirement of the Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, §10, that no state shall make anything but gold and silver a tender in payment of a debt?

a:  YES
b: * NO

38.If the answer to Question #37 is no, then is the premises of the jurisdiction and venue of the tribunal and CRIMINAL COMPLAINT within one of the "states" (Republics) as said organic states are defined in the Constitution for the United States of America?

a:  YES
b: * NO
c:  The answer to question #37 is YES.

39.If the answer to Question #38 is no, then what is the authority for the origin and legal authority for the state in which the premises of the venue and jurisdiction of the tribunal and Respondent CRIMINAL COMPLAINT are lodged?

a:  The authority for the origin and legal authority for the state in which the premises of the venue and jurisdiction of the tribunal and Respondent CRIMINAL COMPLAINT are lodged is attached under exhibit _______________.

b: * The authority for the origin and legal authority for the state in which the premises of the venue and jurisdiction of the tribunal and Respondent CRIMINAL COMPLAINT are lodged is unknown.

c:  The answer to question #38 is YES.

40.Does the tribunal have lawful jurisdiction with regard to the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  YES
b:  NO

41.If the answer to question #40 is no, is the Petitioner entitled to be discharged from the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT for lack of jurisdiction.

a: * YES
b:  NO 
RIGHT OF ACTION/CAUSE OF ACTION

1.Does the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT set forth a controversy? 

a:  YES

b: * NO

2.If the answer to Question # 1 is yes, what is the controversy set forth in the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  The controversy set forth in the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT is attached under exhibit ________.

b: * The answer to question #1 is no.

3.Does the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT set forth the claim that Petitioner herein has a signature on any instruments upon which Petitioner has any legal or equitable duty with respect to the Respondent?

a:  YES
b: * NO

4.If the answer to question #3 is yes, can the Respondent produce a certified copy of said document baring the bona-fide signature of the Petitioner.

a:  The answer of question #3 is yes, a certified copy of said document bearing the bona-fide 
signature of the Petitioner is attached under exhibit ________.

b: * The answer to question #3 is NO.

5.Is Petitioner's prejudice civil or criminal?

a: * Civil
b:  Criminal

6.If the answer to question #5 is criminal, is the prejudice infamous?

a:  YES
b:  NO

7.If the answer to question #6 is yes, did the Respondent initiate the Respondent's action against the Petitioner by indictment or present of the Grand Jury?

a:  YES
b:  NO

8.If the answer to question #7 is no, by what constitutional authority does the Respondent deny the Petitioner the protected right not to be held to answer an infamous crime without an incitement or presentment by the grand jury?

a:  The constitutional authority of the Respondent to deny the Petitioner the protected right not to be held to answer an infamous crime without an incitement or presentment by the grand jury is attached as exhibit ______________.

b:  The Respondent does not have constitutional authority to deny the Petitioner the protected right not to be held to answer an infamous crime without an incitement or presentment by the grand jury.

9.Does the Respondent aver that the Petitioner failed in a duty or obligation to a) a  Washington Session Law or b) a Revised Code of Washington?

a: 
b: 

10.If the Answer to question #9 is Revised Code of Washington, is the Revised Code of Washington actual legislation of the Republic State of Washington?

a:  YES
b:  NO

11.If the answer to question #10 is no, is the Revised code of Washington only evidence of the Legislation of the Republic of Washington?

a:  YES
b:  NO

12.If the answer to question #11 yes, can a citizen be accused of violating evidence?

a:  YES
b:  NO

13.If the answer to question #9 is Washington Session Law, does the law the Respondent avers is the subject of the Respondent's issues against the Respondent to be limited in it's application to a specific class?

a:  YES
b:  NO

14.If the Answer to question #13 is yes, is the class to whom the legislature of the Republic/State of Washington intended the Washington Session Law the Respondent avers is the subject of the Respondent's issues against the Petitioner to be limited in it's application to the class known specifically to the legislature as persons?

a:  YES
b:  NO

15.Does the Legislature of the Republic/State of Washington include natural born citizens in it's specific statutory definition's of the class known as persons?

a:  YES
b:  NO

16.If the answer to question #15 is yes, what is the specific Washington Session Law in which the Legislature of Washington included natural born citizens of the United States in it's specific statutory definition's of the class known as persons?

a:  The specific Washington Session Law in which the Legislature of Washington included natural born citizens of the United States in it's specific statutory definition's of the class known as persons is WSL ___________________ codified in RCW ___________________

b:  The answer to question #15 is NO.

17.If the answer to question #15  is no, does the Respondent have any lawful authority to apply either a Washington Session Law or a Revised Code of Washington to the Petitioner when the Petitioner is not a member of the class known to the Legislature of the Republic/State of Washington as persons?

a:  Yes, the Respondent the lawful authority to apply either a Washington Session Law or a Revised Code of Washington to the Petitioner when the Petitioner is not a member of the class known to the Legislature of the Republic/State of Washington as persons is attached under exhibit __________.

b:  NO, the Respondent does not have lawful authority to apply either a Washington Session Law or a Revised Code of Washington to the Petitioner when the Petitioner is not a member of the class known to the Legislature of the Republic/State of Washington as persons

18.Did the Petitioner file into the record of this tribunal an affidavit containing a statement that the Petitioner has no contractual agreement with Respondent?

a: * YES
b:  NO

19.Was the affidavit referred to in question #6 made under penalties of perjury?

a: * YES
b:  NO

20.If the answer to question #7 is yes, was the affidavit ever rebutted by Respondent?

a:  YES
b: * NO

21.What Instruments does the Respondent aver, contain the Petitioner's bona-fide signature to which a right of action and cause of action have accrued?

a:  The instruments are attached under exhibit __________.
b: * There are no instruments.

22.What instrument, the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT or other, avers that the Petitioner has a bona-fide signature on any instrument which makes the Petitioner liable to the Respondent for any specific performance set forth in the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT? What is the name of this instrument and who has the original of said instrument?

a:  The instruments are attached under exhibit ______.
b: * There are no instruments.

23.Is said instrument a contract or court order?

a:  Contract.
b:  Court Order
c: * There is no instrument.

24.If the answer to question #11 is court order, was said court order signed by judicial officer who signed and filed a written oath of office prior to assuming the duties as a Judicial officer.

a:  YES
b:  NO
c: * There is no court order.

25.If the answer to question #11 is court order, was signing judicial officer a pro tempore judicial officer, and if so did said pro tempore judicial officer comply with the provision of Washington Session Law 1987 c 73 §1; codified in RCW 2.08.180 prior to issuing the order?

a:  YES
b:  NO
c: * There is no court order.

26.Does the Respondent named herein have direct knowledge that Petitioner has bona-fide signatures on any instrument which makes the Petitioner liable to the Respondent for any specific performance set forth in the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?

a:  YES
b: * NO

27.Does the Respondent have any direct evidence, admissible under the rules of evidence by the Republic of Washington, by affidavit under penalty of perjury true, correct, and complete and not misleading, that establishes that the Petitioner herein has any bona-fide signatures on any instrument which makes the Petitioner liable to the Respondent for any specific performance set forth in the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

a:  YES
b: * NO

28.Who is the damaged party in the action?

a:  The Damaged Party is ___________________________________________.
b: * There is no Damaged Party.

29.What substance does the damaged party have at risk?

 The substance the damaged party has at risk is _________________________________.
* There is no Damaged Party.

30.Does the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT disclose the Respondent's right of action and cause of action?

a:  YES
b: * NO

31.If the answer to question #20 no, is the Petitioner entitled to be discharged from the Respondent's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT do to the Respondent's failure to state a cause for which relief can be granted?

a: * YES
b:  NO

I, Patrick H. Oishi, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the forgoing is true, correct, complete and not misleading.

__________________________________________________
Patrick H. Oishi, deputy prosecuting attorney for Pierce County,
 counsel for Respondent

Then appeared before me Patrick H. Oishi, who did affirm and subscribe hereto on this the __________ day of the __________ month of 1997, that the forgoing document as a free act and deed.

_________________________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC                                   Commission Expires ____________

_________________________________________
Submitted by Linda Lee, Stephenson, Petitioner